This week, I had the opportunity to talk on the Nuffield Politics Seminar about my current project on citizens’s preferences on Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) and how they differ from what lawmakers decided. The feedback I got was amazing, though not always practical (“If you could go back in time and vary about 10 experimental conditions …”.
Here are the slides:
RT @kai_arzheimer: From the vault: Deliberation does not reduce the gap between citizens’ and legislators’ ethical preferences https://t.co…
RT @kai_arzheimer: From the vault: Deliberation does not reduce the gap between citizens’ and legislators’ ethical preferences https://t.co…
RT @ponteufpr: Deliberation does not reduce the gap between citizens’ and legislator’s ethical preferences
https://t.co/ajGOWN9PPh
#pol…
Deliberation does not reduce the gap between citizens’ and legislator’s ethical preferences
https://t.co/ajGOWN9PPh
#politics #compol